{A-level} Your robots (info needed, please (urgent!))

All things antweight

Moderators: BeligerAnt, petec, administrator

Do you think a driving trainer bot is a good idea, and would you possibly buy one?

yes
15
65%
no
8
35%
 
Total votes: 23

Andrew_Hibberd
Posts: 1134
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:00 am
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Andrew_Hibberd »

Question1: How much would you be willing to pay for this type of product?
B: ?20-?40

Question 2, how long do you practice driving at a time?
B: 30 mins to an hour

Question 3: would you want standard batteries (ie Alkaline) or Rechargable
B: Rechagable (AAs or AAAs)

Question 4: Would you want a weapon on the trainer bot?
A: No weapon

Question 5: Would you use your weapon against the device?
B: yes (I have a lifter)

Question 6: Which weight class would the device be used with?
A: Antweight

Question 7: Is weight an issue (as long as it fits in size for class)?
B: no, not really

Question 8: What material should be used for the chassis/armour
D: no preference


Hope that helps
TEAM GEEK!
Flippt
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by Flippt »

Question1: How much would you be willing to pay for this type of product?
A: under ?20

Question 2, how long do you practice driving at a time?
A: 30 mins or less

Question 3: would you want standard batteries (ie Alkaline) or Rechargable
C: Rechargable pack (like the ones receivers use)

Question 4: Would you want a weapon on the trainer bot?
A: No weapon

Question 5: Would you use your weapon against the device?
B: yes (I have a lifter)

Question 6: Which weight class would the device be used with?
A: Antweight

Question 7: Is weight an issue (as long as it fits in size for class)?
B: no, not really

Question 8: What material should be used for the chassis/armour
A:Plastic/polycarb
C: Metal
(as in real life, antweights are made out of plastic and metal)
Image
Swedish style!
Fight Robots, Not Humans!
User avatar
Rhys
Posts: 738
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Caerphilly, South Wales

Post by Rhys »

Question1: How much would you be willing to pay for this type of product?
B: ?20-?40

Question 2, how long do you practice driving at a time?
A: 30 mins or less

Question 3: would you want standard batteries (ie Alkaline) or Rechargable
B: Rechagable (AAs or AAAs)

Question 4: Would you want a weapon on the trainer bot?
A: No weapon

Question 5: Would you use your weapon against the device?
B: yes (I have a lifter)


Question 6: Which weight class would the device be used with?
A: Antweight

Question 7: Is weight an issue (as long as it fits in size for class)?
A: yes, it must be in the weight limit

Question 8: What material should be used for the chassis/armour
D: no preference
User avatar
BeligerAnt
Posts: 1872
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Brighton
Contact:

Post by BeligerAnt »

Question1: How much would you be willing to pay for this type of product?
B: ?20-?40

Question 2, how long do you practice driving at a time?
A: 30 mins or less

Question 3: would you want standard batteries (ie Alkaline) or Rechargable
B: Rechagable (AAs or AAAs)

Question 4: Would you want a weapon on the trainer bot?
A: No weapon

Question 5: Would you use your weapon against the device?
B: yes (I have a lifter)

Question 6: Which weight class would the device be used with?
A: Antweight

Question 7: Is weight an issue (as long as it fits in size for class)?
B: no, not really

Question 8: What material should be used for the chassis/armour
D: no preference

Re. Q7: It must be reasonably close to the weight limit, but remember an ant can be up to 225g. The trainer-bot doesn't have to be a walker, but I think it would be an advantage if it weighed as much as one.
Gary, Team BeligerAnt
User avatar
olivers
Posts: 533
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Reading
Contact:

Post by olivers »

Question1: How much would you be willing to pay for this type of product?
A: under ?20

Question 2, how long do you practice driving at a time?
A: 30 mins or less

People practice driving?

Question 3: would you want standard batteries (ie Alkaline) or Rechargable
C: Rechargable pack (like the ones receivers use)

Question 4: Would you want a weapon on the trainer bot?
A: No weapon

Question 5: Would you use your weapon against the device?
yes

Question 6: Which weight class would the device be used with?
A: Antweight

Question 7: Is weight an issue (as long as it fits in size for class)?
B: no, not really

Question 8: What material should be used for the chassis/armour
A: plastic/polycarb
Adam Hargreaves
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 9:25 am
Location: Loughborough
Contact:

Post by Adam Hargreaves »

Thanks to everyone who's done this so far-keep it up guys :)
Team 'In Theory'
Remote-Controlled Dave
Posts: 3716
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland
Contact:

Post by Remote-Controlled Dave »

Question1: How much would you be willing to pay for this type of product?
A: under ?20

Question 2, how long do you practice driving at a time?
C: 1 Hour to 2 hours

Question 3: would you want standard batteries (ie Alkaline) or Rechargable
B: Rechagable (AAs or AAAs)

Question 4: Would you want a weapon on the trainer bot?
D: interchangeable weapons

Question 5: Would you use your weapon against the device?
B: yes (I have a lifter)

Question 6: Which weight class would the device be used with?
A: Antweight

Question 7: Is weight an issue (as long as it fits in size for class)?
A: yes, it must be in the weight limit

Question 8: What material should be used for the chassis/armour
D: no preference
Die Gracefully Robotics
Winner - AWS 39
User avatar
petec
Posts: 555
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Burgess Hill, West Sussex
Contact:

Post by petec »

Question1: How much would you be willing to pay for this type of product?

C: ?40-?70


Question 2, how long do you practice driving at a time?
A: 30 mins or less

Question 3: would you want standard batteries (ie Alkaline) or Rechargable

B: Rechagable (AAs or AAAs)


Question 4: Would you want a weapon on the trainer bot?

B: Lifting device
(PeteC: You need something to avoid - doesn't really matter what though!)

Question 5: Would you use your weapon against the device?

B: yes (I have a lifter)


Question 6: Which weight class would the device be used with?
A: Antweight

Question 7: Is weight an issue (as long as it fits in size for class)?
B: no, not really
(PeteC: but it needs to be within reason - I use a can of coke for driving practise, so I reckon 300g for ants is reasonable.)

Question 8: What material should be used for the chassis/armour

D: no preference
------------
RobotWars101.org
RobotWars101.co.uk
Antweights.com
Antweights.co.uk
AntweightWorldSeries.com
Adam Hargreaves
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 9:25 am
Location: Loughborough
Contact:

Post by Adam Hargreaves »

Product specifications:
Size and Weight
The product should fit within a 4? cube. This is dictated by the rules set out for the Antweight class of fighting robot, which this product is intended to be used against.
The product should weigh as close to 150g as possible. This, again, is set out within the Antweight rules. However, because of the nature of the product, some leeway with weight would be acceptable, and it may be heavier than this if necessary.

Materials
The materials used for the product should be able to withstand the knocks and bangs that this product will probably gain through standard usage to enable the product to have a long lifespan. This includes and is not limited to: damage caused by flippers; spinners; claws; spikes; and damage caused by falling onto the floor from the arena. This resilience to damage will be tested before manufacturing the prototype.
In addition to the point mentioned above, all glues and fixings should also be able to withstand this type of punishment.
Materials used should be designed to last for the useful life of the product and be recyclable when the product is disposed of.

Function
The product should be able to function within a 3? square as dictated by Antweight rules, and should be able to detect when it is nearing the edge of this to avoid driving itself out of it. This is the standard arena size, and it is therefore sensible that driving practice is limited to this area.
The product should be able to detect another robot, and move to push it out of the arena or attack it. This is to simulate the behaviour of another robot while in combat.
The product should be able to self-right if flipped over (or run while inverted). This is to avoid human intervention, (for safety reasons) and also to simulate this occurrence which happens often in battle.

Power
The product should be powered by rechargeable AA or AAA batteries. This information has been gained from my online survey and it is the desire if my potential users that these are used. An onboard charging jack could maybe be provided to aid charging of batteries and remove the need for the product to be taken apart.

Usage Environment
The product will be designed for use indoors, as Antweight combat takes place indoors. This means that the device should not interfere with any electronic equipment such as TVs or stereo equipment, which may be present in the room.

Safety
The product will have functional sharp edges. These must be painted a suitable bright colour to avoid injuring a user. This is specified in the Antweight rules.
The product should not generate any radio interference. This is in line with British Standards, which rule that it should not cause electronic interference.

Cost
The product should cost between ?20-30. This is based on information gained from my questionnaire.

Manufacturing
The product prototype should be capable of being manufactured on the range of machines available at school.

Time
I have the Christmas and Easter terms to design and build, test and evaluate the prototype. This is in accordance with exam board deadlines.

Aesthetics
The product could have any colour scheme, but this could be dependant on the material used. The shape of the product is dependant on the chosen design.

Ergonomics
The product should have some form of remote off switch to allow it to be picked up safely during use. This is a safety measure to prevent injury to a user.
Team 'In Theory'
User avatar
BeligerAnt
Posts: 1872
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Brighton
Contact:

Post by BeligerAnt »

Adam, it looks good. Just a couple of points:

I think you mean a 3' (feet) square arena, not a 3" (inch) one!

I think you might struggle a bit with the 150g weight limit and AA or AAA batteries. You can legitimately go to 225g as this is the maximum weight of an ant. It doesn't mean your trainer needs to be a walker though.

There is no rule about painting sharp edges a bright colour! The rule states that covers shall be fitted when the ant is outside the arena, and the covers shall be bright red. No harm in making your sharp edges/points visible, it's just not a requirement of the antweight rules.

As regards British standards etc, the product would need to be CE marked in order to be placed on the market in Europe. This means it would need to comply with all relevent CE-marking directives. There are lots of them, the ones I think might be relevent are: EMC (definitely), Machinery (maybe), Toys ( I think you might get around this one by declaring that it isn't!). There may be others I don't know about!

You are right about not causing interference, that's half of the EMC directive. The other part is that you must not suffer interference from other equipment (PCs, mobile phones, TV's, electric motors etc etc). There are a set of generic European standards, and then there are some product-specific standards. You need to comply with the appropriate standards.

Hopefully your teachers can give you some guidance on what you need to do for this project, since ensuring product compliance is a nightmare and would take longer than you have for the whole project.

Good luck with it!
Gary, Team BeligerAnt
Post Reply