AWS24
Moderators: BeligerAnt, petec, administrator
-
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Netherlands
after reading the rules a couple of times and discussing this with some other people i request some clarification about the imposed rule at the DBA Evo vs. General Mayhem fight.
the rule 2.B according to AWS rules 4.0 reads:
"A robot that falls off the arena has lost."
nothing more, nothing less.
And the indisputable fact is DBA did NOT fall off the arena, Mayhem did.
the rule 2.B according to AWS rules 4.0 reads:
"A robot that falls off the arena has lost."
nothing more, nothing less.
And the indisputable fact is DBA did NOT fall off the arena, Mayhem did.
-
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Netherlands
-
- Posts: 3716
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 5:30 pm
- Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 3716
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 5:30 pm
- Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland
- Contact:
- peterwaller
- Posts: 3213
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Aylesbury Bucks
- Contact:
Dave
I have emailed you the pdf file.
Tim
The problem is that to build an arena that can be transported in one piece in a normal hatch back you are limited on size. This means you can either have a smaller arena and wide drop off ditches or a good size arena and narrower ditches. As I remember it after some discussions by the commitee about people building robots that unfolded to be larger than the drop and robots flying off and bouncing back it was decided that any robot coming into contact with the wall or the cover on the far side of the drop off were considered to have fallen out of the arena. The rules say the 50% of the arena should be drop off and the cover beyond the ditch is there just for the protection of the watchers and not to retain fly robots. I think that this is probably fair although being a great spinner fan myself I think I would sometimes prefer it the other way especially when its one of my favorite robots. But it is certainly something that could be discussed on this forum. PeteC maybe we could have a section for rule discussions. I believe that the committee would support rule changes, if the concensus of the people agree, and that they do not just want to dictate them.
I have emailed you the pdf file.
Tim
The problem is that to build an arena that can be transported in one piece in a normal hatch back you are limited on size. This means you can either have a smaller arena and wide drop off ditches or a good size arena and narrower ditches. As I remember it after some discussions by the commitee about people building robots that unfolded to be larger than the drop and robots flying off and bouncing back it was decided that any robot coming into contact with the wall or the cover on the far side of the drop off were considered to have fallen out of the arena. The rules say the 50% of the arena should be drop off and the cover beyond the ditch is there just for the protection of the watchers and not to retain fly robots. I think that this is probably fair although being a great spinner fan myself I think I would sometimes prefer it the other way especially when its one of my favorite robots. But it is certainly something that could be discussed on this forum. PeteC maybe we could have a section for rule discussions. I believe that the committee would support rule changes, if the concensus of the people agree, and that they do not just want to dictate them.
- BeligerAnt
- Posts: 1872
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Brighton
- Contact:
Thanks to Josh and family for an enjoyable event.
I can't let it go unmentioned that James won first AND second place in the non-spinner competition!
Congratulations to Oliver and everyone else that won a well-deserved certificate (and key-ring - thanks Josh)
Following Pants and RONNY's mating ritual during one fight, we are expecting a new robot any time soon - it will of course be "Child of RONNY And Pants"
I can't let it go unmentioned that James won first AND second place in the non-spinner competition!

Congratulations to Oliver and everyone else that won a well-deserved certificate (and key-ring - thanks Josh)
Following Pants and RONNY's mating ritual during one fight, we are expecting a new robot any time soon - it will of course be "Child of RONNY And Pants"

Gary, Team BeligerAnt
-
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Netherlands
Peter
I understand, but that rule came out of the blue for me at that time, maybe i'm used to the RW rules for the bigger bots, where the 30 second rule still excists.
Designing rules around transportability of the arena also sounds a bit odd, the DRG have built a class 2 Heavyweight arena and still have no idea how to transport it without some financial support.
The Antweightarena rules are very clear about the design of an arena, if the arena isn't fully compatible with these rules it shouldn't be held against the competitor.
At least a notice in advance would have been nice.
I understand, but that rule came out of the blue for me at that time, maybe i'm used to the RW rules for the bigger bots, where the 30 second rule still excists.
Designing rules around transportability of the arena also sounds a bit odd, the DRG have built a class 2 Heavyweight arena and still have no idea how to transport it without some financial support.
The Antweightarena rules are very clear about the design of an arena, if the arena isn't fully compatible with these rules it shouldn't be held against the competitor.
At least a notice in advance would have been nice.
- peterwaller
- Posts: 3213
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Aylesbury Bucks
- Contact:
I just looked back at the AWS committee section and in the last post for AWS20 where Oliver posted the main points of the meeting.
(Hitting the outside of the arena is to be judged as being out).
That I don't think is clear enough as it does not specify on the drop off sides which is how I remember it but at least it shows we had discussed and published it back in June 2006.
for full post see:
http://www.robotwars101.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=696
It would probably be a good idea to include that in the rules unless the concensus is we change it.
That should read
Hitting the outside of the arena is the be judged as ring out. The first ant to hit the outside or leave the arena is judged to have lost.
(Hitting the outside of the arena is to be judged as being out).
That I don't think is clear enough as it does not specify on the drop off sides which is how I remember it but at least it shows we had discussed and published it back in June 2006.
for full post see:
http://www.robotwars101.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=696
It would probably be a good idea to include that in the rules unless the concensus is we change it.