Failsafe mechanisms

Please post all questions and answers in here. This way people can easily see if someone else has the same problem.

Moderators: BeligerAnt, petec, administrator

Post Reply
User avatar
Simon Windisch
Posts: 1806
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Reading
Contact:

Failsafe mechanisms

Post by Simon Windisch »

Hi there,

I'm using a new SOZBOTS - MX Speed Controller http://www.sozbots.com/stores/popups/SOZDSCR2.htm and am horrified to learn that it does not fail safe if the transmitter turns off.

Has anyone else had experience of this?

Simon
Andrew_Hibberd
Posts: 1134
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:00 am
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Andrew_Hibberd »

I am not aware that anyone else who uses the MX board, i have never had a problem with the dual motor boards. What did it do when the tx was off?
TEAM GEEK!
User avatar
Simon Windisch
Posts: 1806
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Reading
Contact:

Post by Simon Windisch »

When I plugged the battery into the robot it just raced away with the transmitter turned off. If I turn the transmitter on for a few seconds and then turn it off again then the robot fails safe, most of the time. But it's not very good.

Simon
Andrew_Hibberd
Posts: 1134
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:00 am
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Andrew_Hibberd »

Sounds very odd, you could try and turn the tx on before the robot to avoid the stuff at the start. Have you tried speaking with sozbots?
TEAM GEEK!
Adam Hargreaves
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 9:25 am
Location: Loughborough
Contact:

Post by Adam Hargreaves »

I have a big fat warning sticker on my Tx, which warns me to always turn it on first, adn the Rx afterwards...
Team 'In Theory'
Remote-Controlled Dave
Posts: 3716
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland
Contact:

Post by Remote-Controlled Dave »

I've always pretty much ignored that and mine are all fine...
Die Gracefully Robotics
Winner - AWS 39
User avatar
Simon Windisch
Posts: 1806
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Reading
Contact:

Post by Simon Windisch »

Yes, I have contacted Sozbots. Still no reply, still I think that today is a holiday for them.

I believe that if you're using servos then they fail safe automatically.

Simon
User avatar
BeligerAnt
Posts: 1872
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Brighton
Contact:

Post by BeligerAnt »

Simon, I assume you've read the manual? :o
Does the board behave like the manual says it should? It infers (but doesn't explicitly state) that there is some sort of failsafe.
Is your receiver well-behaved? The manual mentions "glitchy" receivers. How does your rx behave with standard servos connected? Is it picking up interference from your PC/mobile phone/etc?
Are all your motors suppressed with ceramic capacitors right across the motor terminals?

Standard servos only have a kind of simple "accidental" failsafe, in that they will generally try to hold position (i.e. stop) in the absence of any data. Noise picked up by a receiver is often interpreted as data and servos will misbehave.
Speed controllers on the other hand usually have a much more sophisticated failsafe mechanism. At power-on they usually wait for a valid "neutral" pulse (or several) before enabling the motor drive circuit. The chances of getting a string of 1.5ms pulses out of the receiver as a result of random interference are slim so the failsafe is quite effective.

To help the support guys diagnose/fix your problem, give them as much information as possible. What is the exact setup? What is the exact sequence of events? What does the LED do? How do the motors run? (Full speed, slowly, steady, erratically, etc) Is the behaviour repeatable? Have you tried different configurations? (Different receiver, crystal, motors etc)
Gary, Team BeligerAnt
User avatar
Simon Windisch
Posts: 1806
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Reading
Contact:

Post by Simon Windisch »

OK, thanks Gary. I need to do some heavy work before AWS 17 then.

Simon
Post Reply