A-level designs-added CAD drawings
Moderators: BeligerAnt, petec, administrator
-
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 9:25 am
- Location: Loughborough
- Contact:
A-level designs-added CAD drawings
Replaced my hand-drawn things with CAD ones. Can I have your opinions please?
Just a point-the top one, the different coloured armour indicates where the armour will be removed to create the place for the weapon module.
Just a point-the top one, the different coloured armour indicates where the armour will be removed to create the place for the weapon module.
Last edited by Adam Hargreaves on Sun Nov 13, 2005 9:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Team 'In Theory'
I went for design 3, I always liked the idea of interchangeable weapons on a training bot such as this, and the chassis it self is a standard sort of shape which would be good for general driving practice.
Scott Fyfe-Jamieson, Captain of Epic Robotics. Champion of AWS38/41/42.
http://www.epicrobotics.co.uk
http://www.epicrobotics.co.uk
-
- Posts: 1134
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:00 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
- BeligerAnt
- Posts: 1872
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Brighton
- Contact:
I think the design has to be invertible, I don't think self-righting is really an option for an autonomous robot. So that discounts 4 and 5.
I like the idea of interchangeable weapons, but I don't think they would fit in the budget, unless they were optional extras.
The big wheels of design 2 would make the control software difficult. RampAnt has big wheels and it is difficult to steer because it turns so fast. The wedge shape looks good though.
I chose design 1. It is invertible, it has a good scoop front (quite difficult to attack), 4WD should make it quite hard to push around. The only downside I can think of is that very low robots are sometimes difficult/impossible to attack, depending on the design of your robot, so it may not suit all people.
Only my opinions, there are no right or wrong answers at this stage!
I like the idea of interchangeable weapons, but I don't think they would fit in the budget, unless they were optional extras.
The big wheels of design 2 would make the control software difficult. RampAnt has big wheels and it is difficult to steer because it turns so fast. The wedge shape looks good though.
I chose design 1. It is invertible, it has a good scoop front (quite difficult to attack), 4WD should make it quite hard to push around. The only downside I can think of is that very low robots are sometimes difficult/impossible to attack, depending on the design of your robot, so it may not suit all people.
Only my opinions, there are no right or wrong answers at this stage!
Gary, Team BeligerAnt
-
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 9:25 am
- Location: Loughborough
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 3716
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 5:30 pm
- Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland
- Contact:
- Bouncy_Bot
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 8:42 am
- Location: In your left ear.....
- Contact: