RobotWars101

So I was thinking about this and the first argument in this thread is interchangable with any other rule that you don't like so I was tempted to build an ant for the event that I attended but this idea of the 4" cube is what put me off. Seems to me to just really limit the levels of creativity ...

antweight team champion ships?

I think that most people see the sense in naming robots...

ATC?

Dave Weston has arranged for an antweight competition to take place at Snibston after Christmas for the third year. Details of the location are at the link above, Last year we also got free entry to the museum and there's a nice cafe there as well. FRA forum topic at http://www.fightingrobots.co.uk/...

As it doesn't really make a difference (except to those who are interested in this one) Why don't we have a vote on this thread. I'm not going to vote here, because I have no preference, but shall we say that the voting choices are (and this is an example - the other dimensions would follow on from ...

Well I just like the four inch rule, I suppose a large robot being "ditch proof" is also a concern. I never had a problem with building to the cube, part of engineering is designing within your limits.

Ah, so you want to move from

Antweight: four inches (101.6mm)

to

Antweight: 101.6mm

No issue

5f) There shall be 3 neutral judges identified before each battle and all shall have an equal vote.